Michael Jacksons Dad Joseph Already Trying To Take Control

Posted: Monday, June 29, 2009 | Posted by Chico Brisbane | Labels: , , ,


If the members of the Jackson family care about the welfare of their brothers children, they will do everything in their power to make sure that Joseph doesn’t get anywhere near these children, their inheritance, or their brothers estate.

While many Americans were shocked by Joe Jackson’s brief interview with CNN before the BET awards, I was not. Don Lemon asked Jackson a question and he responded by saying “Well first I want to make this statement.” And then instructed his business partner to plug their new music venture that has something to do with Blue-Ray. I really couldn’t understand exactly what he was saying over the heavy ebonics.


Nevertheless, this is typical Joe Jackson behavior that I have seen before and witnessed first hand when I met Jackson at a party for Robert Hiltziks B movie Return To Sleep Away Camp, starring Paul DeAngelo at SILK club inside the Pachanga Indian Casino in rural San Diego. In fact, Jackson and Cuba Gooding, Sr. where both milking the attention they got for having famous sons.

However, to see Jackson acting this way before Michael has even been laid to rest is all the proof that I need to know that this man never loved his son. He was smiling ear to ear and you could tell that Don Lemon was surprised by the response to his question.
He is already making the claim that he and his wife Katrhyn have sole authority over Micheals funeral, children and most importantly, his estate.

Paris Museum: Obama Statue In Wax

Posted: | Posted by Chico Brisbane | Labels: , , ,


FRANCE - Complete with new gray hairs and two bodyguards, a wax version of President Barack Obama took a trip Monday to the Eiffel Tower. After visiting France's most famous monument, the statue traveled to Paris' Musee Grevin wax museum, where it will stand alongside the likenesses of Nicolas Sarkozy, Angela Merkel and Vladimir Putin.
Full Story

With Iran In Civil Unrest: What If McCain-Palin Had Won?

Posted: Friday, June 26, 2009 | Posted by Chico Brisbane | Labels: , , ,


Senator John McCain recently criticized President Obama for his handling of the situation in Iran. When asked what advice he would offer to the president, Senator McCain suggested that Obama should follow the example of our founding fathers "that all of us are endowed with certain unalienable rights and that it is our duty to stand up for people who are struggling for freedom."


There is absolutely nothing stated in the Declaration of Independence that suggest anything of the sort. The declaration is little more than a list of greivences that outline to King George the reasons that demonstrate that he has violated the colonists' rights and is therefore unfit to be their ruler: Yet somewhere in the minds of people like John McCain, George Bush, Dick Cheney, Karl Rove and the self-righteous at large, they believe that this document was universal and that it should apply to every nation on earth and that it thereby obligates us (the drafters of the document) to become the defenders of any nation who struggles for freedom, IT DOES NOT! -


It simply outlines very specifically what King George has done or failed to do in the interest of the colonies that has made it necessary for the Colonist to seperate from Great Britain and form a new system of Government. Nothing more, Nothing less.


Nevertheless, it all seems so hypocritical of Senator McCain to be defending the Iranian people when just a matter of months ago, he had a major hard-on to Bomb, Bomb, Bomb -- Bomb, Bomb Iran! - Cheese & Rice! - It's a good thing that he and that nutty broad didn't win the election. The streets of Tehran would be littered with Neda's from one end to the other.


Senator McCains hypocracy seemes to be limitless. McCain was not alone in these carless comments about Iran. GOP candidate Rudy Giuliani indicated he'd consider a preemptive nuclear strike on Tehran. Hardly a month passed without some Republican, along with Democrats like (now-Independent) Sen. Joe Lieberman, predicting an imminent U.S. or Israeli strike.


Inside Iran, the results were precisely the opposite of what conservatives claimed to want. The more categorically they condemned the Iranian regime, characterized President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as the "new Hitler" (the Persian George Wallace is more like it), called "Supreme Leader" Ayatollah Ali Khamenei a megalomaniacal empire builder (Iran hasn't attacked anybody in 300 years), and depicted Iranians generally as an undifferentiated mob of Islamist fanatics, the stronger, and more paranoid, the regime grew.


Notice, though, that one thing we're not hearing is Iranian, or Iranian-American, voices urging the United States to get involved. Quite the opposite. The dramatic events taking place in Iran are a homegrown manifestation of the tensions and divisions within Persian society, and of its uniquely complex and opaque political system. They won't be resolved overnight.


On a recent CSPAN appearance, he said that the British Prime Minister, The Chancellor of Germany, and the President of France have been far more outspoken about Iran while President Obama has remained "basically silent." - This sort of rhetoric is the same political theatre that was indicitive of his presidential campaign. There's nothing wrong with political theatre if you have the ability to pull it off. Senator McCain does not! - He attempted to assert that the British Prime Minister, The President of France, and the German Chancellor has all been far more outspoken on the topic of Iran than Obama.


He said that Obama had been "basically silent" on the issue. Here are the comments from those foriegn leaders that McCain pointed out, followed by the comments of President Obama which McCain equates with silence.


"The eyes of the world are upon Iran at the moment. We want Iran to be part of the international community and not to be isolated but it is for Iran to prove, not just to Britain but to the whole of the world and to their own people, that they can respect these basic rights." - GORDON BROWN British Prime Minister


"How is it that a people such as the Iranian people - one of the world's oldest civilisations, sophisticated, cultured, open - have the misfortune of being represented as they are today by some of their leaders? - NIKOLAS SARKOZY President of France


"We stand beside you all in Iran who seek to demonstrate peacefully."
- ANGELA MERKEL German Chancellor


Now here is what Barack Obama has said on three seperate ocassions. This is what John McCain equates with basic silence.


First Comment 06/15/09 - "I am deeply troubled by the violence that I've been seeing on television. I think that the democratic process, free speech, the ability for folks to peacefully dissent, all those are universal values and need to be respected."


Second Comment 06/19/09 - "I have made it clear that the United States respects the sovereignty of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and is not at all interfering in Iran's affairs. But we must also bear witness to the courage and dignity of the Iranian people, and to a remarkable opening within Iranian society. And we deplore violence against innocent civilians anywhere that it takes place."


Recent Comment 06/23/09 - "The United States and the international community have been appalled and outraged by the threats, beatings, and imprisonments of the last few days. I strongly condemn these unjust actions, and I join with the American people in mourning each and every innocent life that is lost."

- BARACK OBAMA President of The United States


Now other then President Obama calling Ahmadinejad's mother a cock-sucking whore, I'm not sure what he could have said that would have satisfied John McCain or many of his comrades on the right. Now I'm not about to paint the right as a whole into this equasion because there have been many on the right who think that Obama has chosen his words very well. It's really quite sad that John McCain continues to live in this "well if I were President" world that he has carved out for himself.


Democracy in Iraq? - Really?


Owner of GOP Voter Registration Firm Pleads Guilty To Voter Fraud

Posted: | Posted by Chico Brisbane | Labels: , , ,




What's perhaps most interesting here is what isn't mentioned in this story, as written on the Los Angeles Times' "L.A. Now" blog. First, here's their entire blog item...


The owner of a voter-registration company pleaded guilty Tuesday to voter-registration fraud, according to the Los Angeles County district attorney’s office. Laguna Beach resident Mark Jacoby, who collects signatures for petition drives, pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor and was sentenced to three years' probation and 30 days of service with the California Department of Transportation.


Jacoby, owner of Young Political Majors, registered to vote at Los Angeles addresses that were not his own. State law requires petition circulators to be qualified voters. Jacoby will also be required to show proof he is registered at his correct address.


And what they didn't bother to mention in that story?...Amongst other things, the fact that Jacoby and Young Political Majors were hired by the California Republican Party to head up their voter registration efforts in the state. Jacoby had been
arrested for Voter Registration Fraud last October, smack dab during the media's orgasmic heights of last year's phony GOP ACORN "Voter Fraud" hoax, even as Fox "News" (and the other news outlets who similarly fell for the scam) was going wall-to-wall with unsupported insinuations about voter fraud by ACORN, Democrats, and Obama.

I heard the news about the arrest of Jacoby just as I was heading out for an appearance on Fox "News," so I was able to break the news on-air in my own "Fox 'News' Alert." (
Video originally posted here, reposted at bottom of this item.)

Given the way the LA Times blog "covered" the story of Jacoby's plea --- not even mentioning the fact that this guy and his group were hired by the California state Republican Party --- I'd say it's a fair bet Fox wouldn't even have bothered to mention the original arrest at all had I not been on air and forcing them to do so myself. Much as they are unlikely to bother reporting Jacoby's plea today.


Ya think if the head of ACORN had made such a plea (or even been arrested at all) it might have been covered just a bit on Fox "News"?


Spanish Prosecutor Narrows Focus To Bush Six


Spain narrows it’s focus to the “Bush Six” which places US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and other senior Bush administration officials at risk going to jail for crafting the policies that led to the torture of prisoners at Guantánamo? As of yet, no government prosecutor is targeting them in the United States. But thousands of miles away, Spanish attorney Gonzalo Boyé is chasing after Gonzales and five other lawyers, and he has a chance—perhaps not a large one—of convincing his country's legal system to charge these former Bush aides with human rights violations.


For more than a decade, Spanish courts have been the terror of torturers and genocidaires the world over. Operating under the principle of "universal jurisdiction," the country has claimed the right to investigate and, if necessary, prosecute human rights cases that occurred beyond its borders if the countries in question fail to act. Spain first invoked its status as the world's court of last resort in 1998, when Judge Baltazar Garzón of the National Court in Madrid issued an arrest warrant for former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet for his regime's torture and murder of Spanish citizens. Pinochet ultimately escaped prosecution in Spain, but Garzón's move paved the way for more cases.


Sixteen are currently moving through Spanish courts, targeting perpetrators from Israel, China, Guatemala, Argentina, and El Salvador, among other countries. Still, for all the shuffling of paper, Spain has produced only one conviction under the banner of universal jurisdiction: that of Adolfo Scilingo, an Argentinean convicted in 2005 of assassinating left-wing dissidents during the country's "dirty war."


Most recently, Garzón has turned his attention to six former Bush administration figures accused of putting forth specious legal arguments to justify clear violations of the United Nations Convention Against Torture. The so-called "Bush Six" case targets Gonzales; John Yoo, former Justice Department attorney and lead author of the "torture memos"; Douglas Feith, former deputy secretary of defense for policy; William Haynes II, Pentagon general counsel; Jay Bybee, former assistant attorney general; and David Addington, former chief of staff and legal adviser to Vice President Dick Cheney.


The investigation is the handiwork of Boyé, a human rights lawyer who represents several former Guantánamo detainees. According to their criminal complaint, they allege that the Bush Six "participated actively and decisively in the creation, approval and execution of a judicial framework that allowed for the deprivation of fundamental rights to a large number of prisoners," and legitimized "the implementation of new interrogation techniques including torture." In March, Garzón took up Boyé's case and initiated an official investigation; another National Court judge, Ismail Moreno, has since taken over the matter. Theoretically, assuming investigators gather sufficient evidence, indictments and prosecutions could follow, though it's unlikely that any of the Bush administration lawyers would choose to show up in Spain for a trial.


Boyé himself is no stranger to terrorism cases. He spent eight years in a Spanish prison for his involvement in the 1988 kidnapping of businessman Emiliano Revilla, who was held hostage for eight months by members of ETA, a Basque separatist group that appears on the US State Department's list of international terrorist organizations. Boyé claims to only have lent the kidnappers his ID and characterizes his incarceration as the result of "a very unfair trial."
Now, Boyé has become something of a de facto prosecutor. But a recent resolution passed by the Spanish parliament could undermine his case. Spain's two leading political parties—the Socialists and the People's Party—overwhelmingly passed a measure on May 19 calling for a law that would restrict the use of universal jurisdiction. Will the measure quash the Bush Six investigation?

John McCain Keeps Forgetting He Didn't Win The Election

Posted: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 | Posted by Chico Brisbane | Labels: , , , ,


Someone needs to share with John McCain and the rest of these rightwing war mongerers the tragedy that has historically resulted from emposing democracy on uncivilized nations. If Iran or Iraq or any other nation wishes to enjoy the sweet taste of freedom and democracy, they're going to have to endure a long and bloody civil war just as we did.


From the first shot fired at Fort Sumpter in April of 1861 to the surrender of General Lee's Confederate Army at the village of Appomattox in April of 1865. There are more then 600,000 young male versions of Neda laid to rest in battlefields from South Carolina to as far west as Fort Yuma, Arizona and you'd think that John McCain would be privy to this before shooting his mouth off on the floor of the U.S. Senate.




For those that refuse to believe that Barack Obama's stunning victory over John McCain on November 3rd was the result of an overwhelming desire for change away from the divisiveness of the previous 8 years, then consider it devine intervention. Consider it whatever the fuck you want to consider it, but for the love of Christ! - Stop thinking that war is the answer to everything! -


You people live in a polorized world where everything exist at the far extreams. Everything is either black and white, good or evil and you close your eyes to everything in between because to you, it's mondain and unenteresting.


Hopefully the war in Iraq will be the final example that The United States of America should be a defender of freedom and democracy, not the provider of it, nor should we ever spill one drop of American blood emposing it or fighting for it on the behalf of any nation that has yet to earn it for themselves.


Prehaps the Republican Party is selfdestructing for a reason that has yet to be realized. This country can only survive with a two-party system of democracy and it has recently occured to me that perhaps the Republican Party has just run it's course.


Just as other political parties have selfdestructed in our long and colorful history, there has always been another party just waiting in the wings. Perhaps now is the time for the Independent Party to seize the day.

Chico Brisbane

Fox News Cuts Into Gov. Mark Sanfords News Conference

Posted: | Posted by Chico Brisbane | Labels: , , , ,

video

Watch how The Fox News Channel cuts into Sanfords news conference the second that he admits having an affair. But more then that, listen to the moans and groans in the Fox News Room.

Fair & Balanced My Ass!!!

Sanford Puts Mistress Ahead Of Wife And Children In Apology

Posted: | Posted by Chico Brisbane | Labels: , , ,


Gov. Mark Sanford pictured above with the family that he obviously cares little about, admitted Wednesday he's been having an affair with a woman he visited on a secret trip to Argentina. What most in the media didn’t catch was that when Sanford tearfully ran down the list of the many people that he hurt, he put his mistress first even before his wife and children. He also said he'll resign as head of the Republican Governors Association, but of course not a peep about resigning as Governor. Yet again another republican so righteous about the sins of his collogues, but not willing to practice what they preach.


"I've let down a lot of people, that's the bottom line," Sanford said at a news conference. He said he's known the woman about eight years, but their relationship turned into something more a year ago while he was on an economic development trip to Argentina.

Sanford, a 49-year-old father of four, choked up during remarks to reporters. He said his wife has known about the affair for the last five months. Sanford revealed Wednesday morning that he'd gone to Argentina for a seven-day trip. For two days after reporters starting asking questions, his office had said he had gone hiking on the Appalachian Trial.
Meanwhile, first lady Jenny Sanford had told The Associated Press she did not know where her husband went for the Father's Day weekend.


First elected governor in 2002, the former real estate developer has more than year remaining in his second term and is barred by state law from running again. A former three-term congressman, Sanford most recently snared headlines for his unsuccessful fight to turn aside federal stimulus cash for his state's schools. His vocal battle against the Obama administration — and libertarian, small-government leanings — won praise from conservative pundits. Ultimately, a state court order required him to take the money.


Sanford's announcement came a day after another prominent Republican, Sen. John Ensign of Nevada, apologized to his GOP Senate colleagues after revealing last week that he had an affair with a campaign staffer and was resigning from the GOP leadership.


Sanford was born May 28, 1960, in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., the eldest of four siblings. He earned a bachelor's degree in business from Furman University in 1983 and a master's of business administration from the University of Virginia in 1988.


After working for a couple of years in the financial world in New York, he returned to South Carolina and said he was shaped by his summers working on the family plantation. He served in the U.S. House for three terms before honoring a term limits pledge and leaving office in 2001.

In 2002, he defeated incumbent Democrat Jim Hodges by 4 percentage points to become governor and won re-election in 2006, beating Democratic state Sen. Tommy Moore.
Needless to say, the private detective industry is going to have their hands full with the many republican wives suddenly in need of their services.
Chico Brisbane

Proof Why Religion Has No Place In Politics


The recent events in Iran are a perfect example why religion has no place in politics. While religious people founded this nation, they were smart enough to do so while clearly providing in our constitution for a separation between church and state.


The evangelical right would love to have us forever debating the difference between Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays as if it were some sort of mandate to the retail sector, but the fact of the matter is that this is not the issue. This was not a mandate from the government to the retail industry, but rather the retail industry making an attempt to be respectful of all religions by having sales people use the Happy Holidays in lieu of Merry Christmas.

It doesn’t restrict any customer from saying Merry Christmas, Happy Hanukkah, Happy Kwanzaa, or whatever holiday they happen to celebrate. Yet the religious right would have you believe that this is the beginning of the end of christainity on the face of the earth and the only way to prevent it is to have one universal language, one religion, one political party, one nation under God, their God and no other God, so help us God.

What a wet dream it would be for neo-cons if that could actually happen. Could you imagine an elected president, republican of course, but with Rush Limbaugh forever as the Supreme Leader? – What a fucking nightmare! – If America did establish Christainity as it’s universal religion, how long would it be before the first American was sent to jail for dissenting or even worse, shot dead in the street by The National Guard at the order of the American Christian Council that oversees the President? –

I surely believe this is what George W. Bush tried to do during his 8 years in office, but to a much lesser extent, of course. Nevertheless, any extent to where religion is allowed to play a role in politics, is the starting point for the next republican whack job to carry it to the next level.

The way that Ahmadineajad and the Council of Clerics are responding to the election protestors is eerily similar to how the American evangelical right responds to crisis when their own sheep stray from the flock. Take the Mark Foley scandal for instance. They blamed Foleygate on the internet. Then they blamed the gays and political correctness.


Of course these two targets we now know were nothing more than way to divert attention away for the GOP cover-up by demanding an investigation of the “outside help” that was responsible for the October surprise.

"The media and homosexual networks, also owe a public account because they have helped turn what could have been one mans tragedy last year, into this years politics-laden “October Surprise.” Congress should authorize it’s own internal investigation, make it fully independent, and empower it to look at everything, including the role of outside groups. If we’ve learned anything about members of congress gone wild, they’ve usually had plenty of “outside help.”

Of course it didn’t take much digging before the GOP cover-up was discovered and that many, if not every republican leader on the hill already knew or had heard that Mark Foley had a fondness for teenage boys serving as congressional pages.

Even on the democratic side, the moment that I hear any candidate mention God or Praying related to their campaign or their own political ambitions, they have lost any chance of my vote now and forever.


If you want to pary for the safety of our soldiers fighting for democracy around the world, I’ll pray with you. If you want to pary for our country to rebound quickly from these troubled times, I’ll pray with you, but if you publically state that your candidacy is in the hands of God, then you’ve just fucked up in ways that can never be undone as far as my vote is concerned.


YA GOT IT? – GOOD! – NOW GET TO WORK ON SOME GOD DAMN HEALTH CARE REFORM! - Go on! - You don't have time to sit around reading my bullshit!

Chico Brisbane.

Villaraigosa Out! Gavin Newsome in!

Posted: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 | Posted by Chico Brisbane | Labels: , , , ,


With L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa's out of the running for governor in 2010, he has created a fascinating two-way Democratic primary race between San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom and California Attorney General Jerry Brown. The question is how do either of these candidates stand up against former eBay CEO Meg Twitman?


"The answer is no," Villaraigosa told CNN's Wolf Blitzer when asked whether he would run statewide. He added that he felt "compelled" to finish out his second four year term to which he will be sworn in on July 1.


Villaraigosa, the most prominent Latino elected official in California, was once seen as a rising star within the party but his underwhelming victory for a second term in March coupled with recent poll data from the Los Angeles Times suggests that he had lost significant elevation politically over the first six months of 2009.


Polling done in the governor's race showed Villaraigosa running in the mid-teens -- bunched closely with Newsom and trailing Brown by between five and ten points.
So, which candidate benefits from Villaraigosa's drop-out decision? That depends on where you stand.


From the Brown perspective, he is likely to gobble up much of Villaraigosa's support since there is no now candidate who calls the costly Los Angeles media market home and the attorney general is the best known candidate in the field.


That line of thinking is based on the belief -- proven out in numerous statewide elections in California -- that voters pay almost no attention to politics and so name identification is the most powerful tool in a winning candidate's arsenal.


Newsom supporters believe that a mano e mano race with Brown will help cement the generational contrast between the two men -- Newsom is 42, Brown is 72 -- in the eyes of voters.
They also see a real fundraising opening in Los Angeles for Newsom who had largely been limited in collecting cash in the City of Angels with Villaraigosa contemplating the contest
In the 2008 Democratic presidential primary in California, Hillary Rodham Clinton's victory over Barack Obama was fueled by her dominance in the Hispanic community; Clinton won roughly 67 percent of the Latino vote, according to exit polls, while winning statewide 52 percent to 42 percent.


The key to the Latino vote in the 2010 primary could well be Villaraigosa. While we tend to minimize the power of endorsements, a campaign ad in the Los Angeles media market featuring a Villaraigosa endorsement could have a powerful impact on the Latino vote.

Shepard Smith Under Fire To Resign From Fox News

Posted: Monday, June 22, 2009 | Posted by Chico Brisbane | Labels: , , , ,


Beginning with his “We do not fucking torture” outburst on air last month, Shepard Smith has been falling out of favor with the dedicated whack jobs that consider Fox News as their primary source for news and information.

Then on June 10, Smith made headlines once again with his response to the shooting by a white supremacist at the Holocaust Memorial Museum. He said the incident showed that the much-maligned DHS report on violent, right-wing extremists was a “warning to us all,” even though “the right went absolutely bonkers” in response to it.
The right quickly went after him, calling for his resignation from Fox News. In a new interview with the New York Times, Smith responds:

“When a crazy man has walked into a Holocaust museum and shot the security guard, maybe that’s an appropriate time to warn people: you’ve got a crazy person in your life, keep an eye on him,” he said in an interview in his Manhattan office last week.


Mr. Smith said he fully anticipated one result of those comments: the nasty e-mail increased.
“Thousands of them,” Mr. Smith said. “And I know they don’t mean the things they say. I know they don’t hate me and want death on my family.”


What they mostly say, he explained, is: “You don’t belong there.”

Mr. Smith paused a moment before adding: “I do belong here.”


Smith said that his colleagues, such as Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck, are “fascinating, terrific entertainer,” but that he tries to provide the “news” in Fox News.

Rep. Cynthia Davis (R-MO) BITCH! Are You Trippin?

Posted: | Posted by Chico Brisbane | Labels: , , ,



Pictured above in the gaudy pink dress is Missouri State Representative Cynthia Davis who recently offered up some stunning “commentaries” in her June newsletter. They were in response to a press release from the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services on a summer food program.


The program provides “food during the summer for thousands of low-income Missouri children who rely on the school cafeteria for free or reduced-price meals during the regular school year.”


Davis, who is pictured yet again in that same gaudy pink dress, serves as the chairwoman of the Missouri House Special Standing Committee on Children and Families, questioned whether the program is “warranted,” and extolled the hidden benefits of child hunger:



Who’s buying dinner? Who is getting paid to serve the meal? Churches and other non-profits can do this at no cost to the taxpayer if it is warranted. [...] Bigger governmental programs take away our connectedness to the human family, our brotherhood and our need for one another. [...] Anyone under 18 can be eligible? Can’t they get a job during the summer by the time they are 16? Hunger can be a positive motivator. What is wrong with the idea of getting a job so you can get better meals? Tip: If you work for McDonald’s, they will feed you for free during your break. [...] It really is all about increasing government spending, which means an increase in taxes for us to buy more free lunches and breakfasts.


A report by Feeding America found that one in five Missouri children currently lives with hunger. Taking apart Davis’ other arguments, a St. Louis Post-Dispatch editorial noted that most of the summer feeding program sites are actually hosted by churches and that the program, which is funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, fed 3.7 million meals at a total cost of less than $9.5 million last summer — “a pretty good use of federal money.”
Davis has made Keith Olbermann's Worst list two days in a row.

Obama Weekly Address: Financial Reform - Consumer Protection

Posted: Saturday, June 20, 2009 | Posted by Chico Brisbane | Labels: , ,



From the
White House blog:

The President explains his plan to address one of the major causes of the current economic crisis -- the breakdown of oversight leading to widespread abuses in the financial world. The new Consumer Financial Protection Agency will have the sole job of looking out for the financial interests of ordinary Americans by banning unfair practices and enforcing the rules. This is a cornerstone in America’s new economic foundation.

Fox News' Megyn Kelly's Story Not Adding Up

Posted: | Posted by Chico Brisbane | Labels: , , , , , , ,


In the many years that I have been sending greeting cards for all ocassions to friends and family via the United States Postal Service, I am pleased to announce that they have never lost or misdirected a single one. Therefore, I'm having a bit of a problem beleiving The Fox News Channels cliam that they "never" received the letter dated June 15 from Doug Hampton, the husband of Senator John Ensign's mistress.


Tom Lowell, senior producer of "America's Newsroom," hosted by Megyn Kelly and Bill Hemmer, said no one at Fox News ever received a printed letter. Yet in the same breath, Lowell says that a booker on the show received an email from Doug Hampton with the letter in question attached on June 15 — the day before the Senator Ensign's press conference.


"We never received any letter from Mr. Hampton," Lowell told the Huffington Post. "He might have sent it, but we never received it. He did reach out to us about 24 hours before the news conference, and he sent an e-mail to a booker on my staff." Lowell said that a member of his editorial staff followed up with Hampton on the 15th when they received the email with the letter that they never recieved included as an attachment.


According to Lowell, he said that they followed up with Hampton, but that he seemed evasive and not credible. "We didn't pursue it," he said. "We certainly weren't going to rush to air with accusations against a sitting Senator without doing due diligence on the reputability of the claims." - Okay....that sounds good, but we are talking about the network that went to air with Obama is a muslum, potentially not a U.S. citizen, attended a madrassa as a child, palled around with unrepentant terrorist. The same Obama whom at the time was not only a sitting Senator, but a presidential candidate to boot. I found Mr. Lowell's next statement even more laughable then the last.


"I know there are people asking if we alerted the senator," Lowell said. "Definitely no one on our editorial team called anyone in Senator Ensign's office prior to our announcement. We just hadn't gotten to that point of confirming the story yet. Somehow, somebody told the Senator something and I don't know how that happened.


Well...jeepers-creepers, that is a fucking mystery, isn't it? - Good thing he's already ruled out anyone on the editorial team. That narrows it down from a couple of hundered possibilities to just shy of a couple hundred possibilities and I think that Lowell detected the rediculousness of his comment as soon as it spewed forth because he followed that up with an emphatic denial that he could not possibly be substantiate.


Lowell stated emphatically that no one at Fox News reached out to the Senator to alert him and my follow up question(s) would be: How can you be sure? and Would you bet your life on it?
Fox News is denying reports the network received a letter from Doug Hampton, whose wife had an affair with Sen. John Ensign, sent five days before Ensign's news conference, detailing the entirety of the affair. Yet they admit that they recieved an emial on June 15 - 24 hours before Senator Ensign went public with the affair.


"I categorically deny that we ever reached out to the senator in any way shape or form prior to him making his announcement," said Lowell. Apparently Mr. Lowell made this statement unaware of the fact that Senator Ensign's spokesman
said the senator disclosed his affair with Hampton’s wife, Cynthia, because her husband had approached "a major television news channel before Tuesday," the day Ensign admitted the affair. This all but confirms that Ensign was tipped off by Fox News and the good news is that it wasn't anyone on the editorial staff.

Why didn’t Fox ever reveal the existence of what should have been newsworthy information they had. Even after Senator Ensign went public with the affair, Fox news kept the letter under wraps until The Vegas Sun got their hands on a copy. Only then did they admit recieving an email with the letter attached.


"We always evaluate people when they call into the newsroom in terms of: does this sound like its solid? Does it sound like its actionable?" Lowell said. "There were some questions here, so we decided that we would make some inquiries but that it wasn't something we needed to move on immediately. And before we could nail everything down and confirm this story the Senator had already announced his press conference."


Lowell denies that anyone at Fox News would have contacted the senator to give him a head's up on Hampton's allegations, but it may not be so simple. Here is a snip from the
Las Vegas Sun – which has done exceptional coverage of this story:

"In a letter dated five days before Sen. John Ensign’s public confession of an extramarital affair, Doug Hampton pleaded to a national Fox News anchorwoman for help in exposing the senator’s "heinous conduct and pursuit" of Hampton’s wife.


Hours before the Sun obtained an unsigned copy of the letter, Ensign’s spokesman said the senator disclosed the affair with Cynthia Hampton because her husband had approached "a major television news channel before Tuesday," the day Ensign admitted the affair. "We learned of this fact before the news conference," the spokesman noted in an e-mail."


Doug Hampton's letter is chilling, raising serious questions of threats and retaliation from Ensign that should have been considered when someone at Fox seems to have tipped Ensign off. It should be noted that Hampton does not specify the nature of his concerns nor provide supporting materials for his allegations. That said, Hampton does write that he wishes to meet with Fox News to furnish them with the information. Ensign went public only five days later, making it unlikely that Hampton had the time to meet with Fox and present them with the particulars.


Once Ensign went public, however, Fox should have immediately revealed that they had been approached, even if only to make it known they had been working this story. This morning's comment from Lowell does not address the issues. Instead, additional questions are raised.
None of Fox’s reporting on this scandal discloses something as important as Hampton’s reaching out to Kelly, at least not from what I have seen. But does that alone support Fox's claims that they never received the letter? No.


Consider that Lowell says that Hampton reached out to Fox 24 hours before Ensign's press conference and that Fox thought "that it wasn't something we needed to move on," and questioned Hampton's credibility. But why did they not revisit Hampton's allegations after the Ensign news conference, in which he admits to the affair with Cynthia Hampton?


Moreover, they have yet to provide Hampton's side of the story, even though they have now confirmed that he reached out to them. Why? If Hampton is indeed not credible, then what is he not credible about? In addition, Fox did reporting as this scandal was breaking and did not mention the letter they claim not to have gotten NOR the email they admit to receiving.


Take for example
this article from Fox News, in which it is reported that Ensign came forward about the affair because of extortion and see if you notice anything of importance missing:
"An influential Republican senator went public Tuesday about an extramarital affair he had with a member of his campaign staff -- a decision that FOX News sources say was prompted by a blackmail threat.


Two Senate Republican sources close to Sen. John Ensign of Nevada told FOX News that a former employee had asked Ensign for money in what both sources described as a case of "extortion."


The employee, Doug Hampton, worked in Ensign's Senate office, and his wife, Cindy Hampton, worked for Ensign's re-election campaign. Both ceased working for the senator shortly after the affair ended, the sources said, with Cindy Hampton receiving a severance package. The circumstances of Doug Hampton's departure remain unclear.


Ensign spokesman Tory Mazzola said the affair took place between December 2007 and August 2008 with a campaign staffer who was married to an employee in Ensign's Senate office, however, it wasn't immediately clear whether the Hamptons were the couple in question. Ensign, 51, said he would not mention the name of the campaign aide involved in the affair. He described the woman and her husband as good friends."


Fox News does not mention that they already knew of the allegations or that they already knew of Hampton’s identity. After all, Hampton did email them - they have confirmed this. Regardless of what happened with the letter, they already knew who Hampton was and what his allegations were. Even if we assume that Fox did not get Hampton's letter, the ethical lapse here is troubling.


They have reported on a story that they had been tipped off to in which at least one major allegation - the affair - was confirmed by all parties, and the person tipping them off is the spouse of the woman having an affair with a Senator. They mention none of this in any of their reporting. So why should we trust them when they say they did not receive the letter?
If we take the allegations at face value, however, then Fox had the letter five days before Ensign came forward, making the extortion claim a bit questionable. In addition, there seems to be no attempt to contact Doug Hampton for comment, even though he has already contacted them. Why?


In another article, Fox News once again makes no mention of the letter, the email - now confirmed - nor seem to be terribly interested in the other side of the story. They do not contact the Hamptons about the extortion claim they are reporting on. Why?

Prior to Fox's denials this morning, the Las Vegas Sun approached Kelly for comment before they published Hampton's letter. Kelly, however, declined to comment which, given her day job, is astounding. She is a journalist and the subject of a story tip could publicly incriminate her or someone on her team of violating something as sacrosanct as source confidentiality. Why would she at least personally confirm if she had gotten the letter or not? Why would she not confirm that she had gotten the email? Why did she not say what Lowell has said?


When you are reading the letter Hampton wrote to Kelly, reprinted below in full, the following questions should be kept in mind. Also keep in mind that we don't know for sure if the letter ever reached her. We do, however, now know that an email reached Lowell 24 hours prior to Ensign's presser:


-Why does Hampton seem to place all of the blame on Ensign for the affair? It seems to me that he is suggesting that the couple were under financial pressure and that Ensign was somehow threatening them. He also appears to be concerned for his safety. Again, although Hampton does not provide evidence to support his allegations, he indicates that he will furnish Fox with additional information when the network and he meet.


-Did Fox actually work the story and contact Ensign for comment in the process, thereby informing him of the story? If so, where is that story and why won’t Kelly say so? If Kelly and team were not working the story, then why not? What did they do with the information?
-How did Ensign find out that Hampton had approached Fox? Or did Ensign not know for sure it was Fox, but somehow know that Hampton had approached a major media outlet? Having received countless letters from various people asking me to look at their stories, I can tell you that the only people who know the tips and leads you are working on are you and your editor (once you inform him or her).


Granted, Kelly has a TV show and it is possible that she first went to Fox lawyers rather than investigate the matter. Still, if that is the case, why not simply explain that she was in the early process of the investigation rather than not comment at all when asked about the letter? Considering that Ensign came forward only five days after the letter was allegedly sent, Kelly's lack of explanation on the matter is especially troubling. Considering too that at the very least, Kelly's team was informed of Hampton's allegations and concerns 24 hours prior to Ensign coming forward, again making Kelly's silence very troubling.


Think about this. Ensign had to organize his approach, speak to his family, lawyers, and the RNC and even get a speech together. Five days is not a great deal of time to do all of this. So assuming Kelly got the letter and then did tip Ensign off and we don't yet know for sure if that is the case - it is likely that it would have happened within the first few days.


Nevertheless, Mr. Hampton must have fallen out of the stupid tree and hit every branch on the way down if he ever thought for one minute that The Fox News Channel was going to assist him in blind-siding a republican Senator with accusations of adultry.

Republican Hipocracy On The Rise

Posted: Friday, June 19, 2009 | Posted by Chico Brisbane | Labels: , , , ,


Senator Ensign should resign and not because he had an aldulterous affair, but rather because of his selfrightous demands for others to resign when they were in the same situation. Of course that's not likely since republicans can rationalize just about anything. In spite of the global economic meltdown brought on by George W. Bush's economic mismanagament in persuit of an unregulated free-market ideology, republicans still attempt to sell American's on self-regulation.


They accuse President Obama of having a September 10th mentality and thereby making the country less safe. I submit that it's the republican's that have a November 2nd mentality and are thereby ignoring the virtual electorial bitch slapping that was handed to John McCain and Sarah Palin on November 3rd by a vast majority of those same American's.


For a complete and utter lack of new ideas, they attempt to rewrap and rename the fundamentals of Reganomics that for the most part, are what have brought us to the edge of the abyss where the nation now finds itself. What conservative evangelicals need to ask themselves is this: If you're worth millions as most politicians are, is there any resession or even a full blown depression that could effect you in the same way as a person on a fixed income or a member of the working middle class? Conservative evangelicals have fallen into the trap of looking to the republican party as a one stop shop for political representation based mostly on their religious beliefs.


While I don't agree completely with some far left leaning idologies of the democratic party, there is a broader picture that I must take into account for the benefit of myself and my family. But at some point, even the religious right will have to decide if they want to continue voting for the hipocracy of people like John Ensign, Mark Foley, David Vitter, Larry Craig, and many others who wrap themselves in their religious beliefs, but then cheating on their wives, chasing after teenage boys on the hill, or solicite gay sex in public restrooms.


What takes this hiprocracy to its pinnacle is when they climb atop of thier ivory tower and demand the resignations of those who were caught before them doing the same thing, yet refuse to resign after being caught temselves.


The republicans talk about healthcare reform, but never offer up anything that remotely sounds like a plan to make healthcare accessable to any Armerican who wants it. While President Obama has said time and time again that universal health care will not replace private health care and that if you have a plan you like, you're free to keep it. Yet the republican fear mongerers in both houses of congress tell anyone who will listen that "socalized medicine" will force everyone to accept government health care.


Does anyone believe that Blue Cross, Blue Shield, HelathNet, Kaiser Permenente, and a hundered other medical insurance providers, PPO's and HMO's are just going to go quietly into the night so that the government can takeover the healthcare industry? - If you have ever found yourself in the doctors office without insurance or God forbid, the emergency room, you know that the cost of primary medical care in the United States is outrageous and there is no justification for it other then to punish the unemployed, uninsured, and retired persons not yet eligible for medicare.


For most people the recession is abundantly clear. People are worried about their jobs, their retirement, their friends and family because we all know someone who has been impacted by the recession. Because of this awareness, people are more cautious with spending which of course has impacted the economy as well. Unless you live in a cave it's difficult to miss the seriousness of the recession. Unless you are a banking executive who was bailed out by those same taxpayers who are concerned about the recession.


Many on the right couldn't care less if the American auto industry collapses, yet many of those Ford, GM, and Crysler employees are responsible for voting these obtuse bastards into office because he she was attracted to their pro-life idology, their stand against same-sex marriage. However, I can assure you that as the layoff slips are passed out around the factory and the forclosure sale of their home looms on the horizon, these issues while still important, don't really resonate as reasons to hand out their vote for political representation.


Suddenly Chuck and Steve from down the street aren't at the top of the list of problems to solve. While many will not agree with my perception of things as I see them, let me leave you with a simple fact! - "It's never as bad as The Fox News Channels makes it out to be."


Don't drink the Kool-Aid!


Chico Brisbane

Husband of Ensign's Mistress Asked Fox News For Help

Posted: | Posted by Chico Brisbane | Labels: , , , , , ,


Doug Hampton, the husband of Cynthia Hampton, who had an affair with Sen. John Ensign, explains in a letter to a Fox News Channel anchorwoman, Megyn Kelly, how the senator’s affair with his wife has"completely ruined" the couple’s lives.


He appealed to Megyn Kelly and to Fox News to help him get this story out. Hampton said that he could have gone to a liberal media outlet but chose Fox for their professionalism. Apperently Mr. Hampton had either forgotten or even worse, had yet to realize that The Fox News Channel is not in the business of reporting on republican's in an unfavorable light

I wonder if Mr. Hampton is still sitting around wondering who could have tipped Senator Ensign off about his plans to go public? Could he possibly still be rationalizing that Senator Ensign's sudden and unexpected press conference was just a coinsidence? - Let me help you out here Mr. Hampton. Don't be such a dope! - Words like trust - professionalism - and Fox News do not belong in the same sentance.


The letter is dated June 11, 2009. Its text follows in full and is published without any corrections to its grammar or spelling.

Thursday, June 11, 2009
Fox News- Corporate Office
1211 Avenue of the America’s (sic)
New York, New York 10036
Megyn Kelly,

More than any time in my life I understand why people take matters into their own hands. I am disheartened! I have sought wise counsel, tried to do the right thing and continue to run into road blocks (sic) in dealing with a very terrible circumstance and injustice that lives in my life. I am hoping you and Fox News can help.

My name is Doug Hampton. I am a former employee of US (sic) Senator John Ensign. I worked for Senator Ensign in his official government office on Capitol Hill from November 2006 to April 2008. My responsibilities were the oversight of his personnel in Washington as well as the state of Nevada. Duties included budgets, policy and public speaking on behalf of the Senator and his initiatives.

Here is my story. In December of 2007 in the midst of some very difficult personal issues that deeply impacted my family and marriage, Senator Ensign pursued and engaged in a relationship with my wife. Our families were lifelong friends, our children attend school together to this day, and our homes are in neighborhoods across from each other. My wife was the Senator’s campaign treasurer.

There is a tremendous amount (sic) of details and critical facts associated with this story and their relationship that will not be addressed in this letter but are very important and need to be further explored if you choose to meet with me. The purpose of this letter is to establish the framework for discussion and provide enough information to warrant a meeting with you and Fox News. This is the only letter of its kind and no other news stations have been contacted with this information. I have great respect and affection for Fox News and many of your collages (sic). I’m sending this to you because you have a legal back ground (sic) and this story has several legal elements.

The unethical behavior and immoral choice of Senator Ensign has been confronted by me and others on a number of occasions over this past year. In fact one of the confrontations took place in February 2008 at his home in Washington DC (sic) with a group of his peers. One of the attendee’s (sic) was Senator Tom Coburn from Oklahoma as well as several other men who are close to the Senator. Senator Ensign’s conduct and relentless pursuit of my wife led to our dismissal in April of 2008. I would like to say he stopped his heinous conduct and pursuit upon our leaving, but that was not the case and his actions did not subside until August of 2008.
The actions of Senator Ensign have ruined our lives and careers and left my family in shambles. We have lost significant income, suffered indescribable pain and emotional suffering. We find ourselves today with an overwhelming loss of relationships, career opportunities and hope for recovery. Our pursuit of justice continues to place me and my family in harm’s way as we fear for our well being (sic).

Today, Senator Ensign’s responsibility and stature have increased within the US (sic) Senate. His is currently the head of "Policy" for the Republican Party, the number four position within the Parties (sic) leadership team. We on the other hand are completely ruined and left to deal with the aftermath of very evil and completely unjustifiable acts by one of our countries (sic) top leaders.

It appears there may be nothing the law can do to correct and bring justice and restitution to (sic) this terrible wrong that has been done to us. I have sought a number of lawyers who are having difficulty finding charges that may hold up in court. There are either technicalities that exist due to the time period in which I have sought help, or other nuances that quite frankly make no sense to me given the egregious acts and blatant abuse of power by Senator Ensign. From my perspective this whole nightmare is terribly wrong and completely unacceptable and should not be tolerated.

I clearly understand this story is difficult to believe for anyone reading (sic) for the first time. I too would have difficulty believing it, if someone brought me this story. However I assure you it is true and there are facts, a paper trail, phone records and personal witnesses to testify to its truth. It is my belief we are dealing with a very powerful person and an institution in the US (sic) Senate that only the media can pierce to expose the wrong and bring light and focus to what needs to be done? (sic) Please help me! This should not be how the leadership of our country should be allowed to behave. I need justice, help and restitution for what Senator Ensign has done to me and my family. Regardless of technicalities, regardless of position, regardless of power this cannot and should not be tolerated in our country from our trusted leaders. Will you help? Will you consider a meeting with me to further discuss this story and what can be done to bring justice and correction to this situation?

I love this country and considered it a great privilege to work in the US (sic) Senate. I am bringing this to you and Fox News to address this professionally and correctly. I could have sought the most liberal, Republican hating media to expose this story, but there are people’s lives at stake and justice is about proper process as well as outcome. Senator Ensign has no business serving in the US (sic) Senate anymore! I will send you and (sic) email as well as leave you and your staff messages in an attempt to meet you and your team as soon as possible. I live and work in Nevada but can be in New York within hours, I look forward to your help.

Sincerely,Doug Hampton

Allen Stanford Arrested By FBI After Indictment

Posted: | Posted by Chico Brisbane | Labels: , , , ,


R. Allen Stanford, under investigation in an alleged $8 billion fraud involving sales of certificates of deposit through his Antiguan bank, surrendered to federal agents and was taken into custody, his lawyer said.


Stanford, 59, surrendered yesterday to Federal Bureau of Investigation agents who were waiting outside his girlfriend’s house in Fredericksburg, Virginia, said
Dick DeGuerin, a lawyer for the Texas financier.













Stanford, a one time sponser for the Fox News Channels Sean Hannity and his radio program. At one point, Hannity was actually reading radio ads for Stanford and soliciting his own listeners to invest money into Stanford Coin & Bullion. It's still not known if any of more then 30,000 defrauded investors sustained losses via the Coin & Bullion entity.












"Federal agents in black SUVs surrounded his girlfriend’s house this afternoon, and just sat there," DeGuerin said in a phone interview. "I told him to walk out and introduce himself. So he did, and he asked them, ‘If you’ve got a warrant, take me into custody. If you don’t, I’m going to Houston.’ And they did, so they arrested him."
DeGuerin said he didn’t know when Stanford would be arraigned or whether he would be returned to Houston to face charges that haven’t yet been made public.
Stanford is scheduled to appear in federal court in Richmond today for indictment on fraud charges, the Associated Press reported, citing unidentified law enforcement officials.
Gilbert Lopez, chief accounting officer at Stanford Group Co., was arrested in Houston this morning and will be arraigned later today, said his lawyer,
Dan Cogdell. New criminal charges also were filed against Laura Pendergest-Holt, 35, Stanford Group Co.’s chief investment officer, according to Cogdell.
Surrender Next Week
"She will surrender to a summons in Houston some day next week," he said yesterday in a phone interview.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission sued Stanford, Pendergest-Holt and a business associate in February, accusing them of running an $8 billion fraud through Antigua-based Stanford International Bank Ltd.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Gregg Costa, a lead prosecutor on the Stanford case, and FBI agent Vanessa Walther spent the afternoon meeting with a grand jury in the Houston federal courthouse. Grand jury deliberations are closed, and no details of the proceedings were made public.
U.S. Magistrate Judge
Frances Stacy in Houston yesterday said two sealed indictments would be handed up by the grand jury and then closed her courtroom to receive them. Prosecutors and FBI agents involved in the Stanford investigation remained in the courtroom.
Grand Jury
Costa declined to say whether the grand jury was the one investigating Stanford and his businesses.
Ian McCaleb, a Justice Department spokesman, declined to comment on the grand jury proceedings and didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment on Stanford’s arrest and details on when he will be arraigned.
The Stanford Group Co. sold $8 billion of certificates of deposit in Stanford International Bank. The company’s network of financial advisers told clients their money would be placed primarily in easily sold financial instruments monitored by more than 20 analysts and audited by Antiguan regulators, according to the SEC lawsuit.
Instead, the "vast majority" of the portfolio was managed by Stanford and
James M. Davis, the company’s chief financial officer, who invested much of it in private equity and real estate, according to the regulatory agency. Davis, who was named in the SEC suit, is cooperating with prosecutors, his lawyer, David Finn, said in April.
Stanford International Bank touted "improbable, if not impossible" returns, the SEC said then in its complaint.
Obstruction Charge
Pendergest-Holt was arrested by FBI agents on Feb 26 and was charged with obstructing the SEC’s probe by making misrepresentations to its representatives while under oath.
On May 14 she entered a plea of not guilty before U.S. Magistrate Judge
Mary Milloy in Houston. The judge set a trial date of July 20 before U.S. District Judge Vanessa D. Gilmore.
Stanford has said he did nothing wrong. "I’m not a damn swindler," he told Bloomberg News in April.
The Mexia, Texas, native, who was knighted by the government of Antigua and Barbuda in 2006, has publicly asserted his constitutional right against self-incrimination and refused to testify or provide documents to federal investigators.
Ranked by Forbes Magazine’s last year as the 605th richest person in the world, Stanford had an estimated net worth of at least $2 billion, according to a March 2008 filing in a Florida paternity case brought by a mother of two children.
U.S. District Judge
David Godbey, who is presiding over the SEC case in Dallas, in February froze the assets of the Stanford companies and those belonging to Stanford, Davis and Pendergest- Holt.
Lawmakers’ Probe
Also yesterday, 16 members of Congress asked the SEC to release all documents in the Stanford probe. In a letter to SEC Chairman
Mary Schapiro, they requested internal memos and information the agency received discussing potential wrongdoing by Stanford and his associates.
The lawmakers also called for an audit of all expenses incurred by Dallas lawyer
Ralph Janvey in his role as the receiver appointed to recover funds for Stanford’s clients.
The SEC case is Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stanford International Bank, 09cv298, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas (Dallas).

John Ensign Has Reached The Pinnacle of Hyprocracy

Posted: | Posted by Chico Brisbane | Labels: , , , , ,


Sen. John Ensign’s political career remains in a free-fall after admitting an affair. Ensign says "I am blessed to have a wife like Darlene who has found it in her heart to forgive me." There is no greater hyprocracy then Ensign fighting tooth and nail to deny others the right to be bound within the sancity of marrige, while he was violating the vows of his own marriage and showing a total disregard for that sacred union. Since Mr. Ensing has proven himself to be an adulterer and a hypocrate, it will be interesting how vocal he intends to be on the issue of marriage and particularly same-sex marriage going forward.


Wednesday, with his resignation from a top
Senate leadership post and increasing uncertainty on Capitol Hill about whether more damaging details of his infidelity would continue to leak out.
Frustrated GOP leaders moved swiftly to distance themselves from the sex scandal, with Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) accepting Ensign’s resignation as chairman of the Republican Policy Committee.


Yet there are several lingering questions over the Nevada Republican’s
extramarital affair with a former campaign aide: Was there an attempt to blackmail Ensign? Have there been other affairs, as The Associated Press has reported? What were the circumstances of the aide and her husband’s departure from Ensign’s staff? Have there been any violations of Senate ethics rules in how the situation was handled with the staffers?

After making a public apology Tuesday,

Ensign stayed away from Capitol Hill and made no public appearances Wednesday. He has yet to fully disclose the extent of his romantic relationship with his former campaign staffer, 46-year-old Cynthia Hampton, which aides say took place between December 2007 and August 2008.

The senator has yet to publicly explain the circumstances of the resignations of Hampton and her husband, Doug, from Ensign’s

staff last year during the affair. The two left his staff in the spring of 2008, even though the affair carried on for months after their departure. Questions continue to linger over why Ensign came forward Tuesday — nearly a year after the relationship ended — whether his admission followed an attempt to extort money from him and if the Hamptons’ departure from his staff was related to the affair.

If Doug Hampton was removed from his office to cover up the affair, "that’d be a big problem," said Melanie Sloan, head of the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.
An

attorney representing the Hamptons issued a statement late Wednesday confirming that Cynthia Hampton was the woman with whom Ensign had an affair.

"It is unfortunate the senator chose to air this very personal matter, especially after the Hamptons did everything possible to keep this matter private,"

attorney Daniel Albregts said. "It is equally unfortunate that he did so without concern for the effect such an announcement would have on the Hampton family. In time the Hamptons will be ready and willing to tell their side of the story."

Rumors of another Ensign affair surfaced Wednesday when The Associated Press cited an anonymous source who said Ensign had a relationship with another former aide in 2002 before he took a two-week leave of absence to deal with a personal family matter. An Ensign aide strongly denied the report.


For Republicans still reeling from last year’s election and eager to spotlight their message in advance of big summer battles on the Hill, the Ensign drama was unwelcome news.
This is the third sex scandal that McConnell has had to deal with since he became GOP leader, and the first to befall a member of his leadership team. Former Sen. Larry Craig (R-Idaho) was involved in a men’s room sex sting in 2007, and Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) was implicated in a prostitution scandal in the same year.


The swift movement by Republicans — with Ensign’s consent — to clear him out of leadership was a sign that Senate Republican

Conference now has "zero tolerance" for this kind of scandal at a time when the party is struggling to rebuild, several aides said Wednesday.

"He’s accepted responsibility for his actions and
apologized to his family and constituents," McConnell said in a statement. "He offered, and I accepted, his resignation as chairman of the Policy Committee."

FBI: Child porn on accused museum shooter computer

Posted: Thursday, June 18, 2009 | Posted by Chico Brisbane | Labels: , , ,



Child pornography was found on a computer belonging to the white supremacist charged with shooting and killing a security guard at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, the FBI said in court documents.
Agents found the material on a desktop computer seized from the Annapolis, Md., apartment where 88-year-old James von Brunn lived with his son and son's finacee, FBI Special Agent Ronald Farnsworth said in an affidavit filed Wednesday in support of a search warrant. Investigators searched the home last Thursday, taking more than 30 items, including ammunition, computers, thumb drives, CDs, memory cards, cell phones and videos.
Authorities will analyze who had access to the computer to determine whether the pornography was von Brunn's, or if it could have belonged to someone else, prosecutors said. No decisions on charges have been made.
The documents didn't say what form the pornography was in, or how much of it was there. Nevertheless, it will be interesting to see how Glenn Beck and others at Fox News react to these new developments.

In separate documents filed on Wednesday, the FBI said it found 35 rounds of .22-caliber ammunition in a search last Thursday of von Brunn's car, which was parked outside of the Washington, D.C., museum during the shooting a day earlier.
Investigators said they also found a notebook in the car with handwritten notes saying, "The Holocaust is a lie. Obama was created by Jews. Obama does what his Jew owners tell him to do. Jews captured America's money. Jews control the mass media."
Von Brunn faces murder charges in the death of Stephen T. Johns and remains hospitalized after being hit in the face by guards who returned fire.
The FBI has said he is likely to survive. A hearing is set for Monday for an update on his condition. No date has been set for von Brunn's initial court appearance.

Poll : Is Bill O'Reilly Partly Responsible For Tiller Murder?

Posted: Monday, June 15, 2009 | Posted by Chico Brisbane | Labels: ,

MicroPoll
Could Scott Roeder have been encited to strike by Bill O'Reilly's relentless verbal assults on
Dr. Tiller? -





Bush DOJ Failed To Hunt For Rightwing Extreamist

Posted: | Posted by Chico Brisbane | Labels: , , ,


In the wake of the murder of Dr. George Tiller by an anti-abortion extremist, the very real problem of extremist violence against abortion providers and clinics has gained a fresh spotlight, even though that violence is not new. After the 1993 murder of an abortion provider, Dr. David Gunn, Congress passed the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, which made any use of “force, threat of force or physical obstruction” against doctors and patients a federal crime. The law was an attempt to put an end to the constant wave of death threats, acts of vandalism, and clinic bombings.
According to the National Abortion Federation, the “FACE law has had a clear impact on the decline in certain types of violence against clinics and providers, specifically clinic blockades.” Under the Bush Administration, however, criminal and civil enforcement of the law by the Department of Justice declined dramatically, the Washington Independent’s Daphne Eviatar reports:
The day after Dr. George Tiller was murdered, TWI obtained data revealing that under the Bush administration, criminal enforcement of the federal law designed to protect abortion providers and clinics had declined by more than 75 percent over the last eight years.
But there’s also a civil component to that federal law, known as the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, or FACE Act. That part of the law allows the attorney general to seek an injunction and compensatory damages for anyone who’s been harmed by any activity that violates the law. And it turns out that the Department of Justice over the last eight years didn’t use that part of the law to protect abortion providers, either.
Eviatar found that, according to DOJ statistics, the Bush Administration “brought only about two criminal prosecutions per year in the entire country under the FACE Act, and never more than four in any single year.” In contrast, under President Clinton the Justice Department “prosecuted 17 defendants for violations of the FACE Act in 1997 alone, and an average of about 10 per year since the law was enacted in 1994.” Evitar reports though that the Bush Justice Department had an even more abysmal record of enforcing the civil component of the FACE Act:
Yet despite these broad powers that Congress granted the attorney general in 1994 to prevent and combat violence against abortion clinics and providers, the Bush administration almost never used them. From 2000 until 2008, during the eight years of the Bush administration, the Justice Department filed only one civil case under the FACE Act. From 1994 until 1999, in contrast, in just five years of the Clinton administration, the Department filed 17 civil cases under the FACE Act — in addition to its much heavier load of criminal cases that we’ve reported before.
Between 2000 and 2008, the National Abortion Federation recorded 3,291 acts of violence against abortion providers and “at least 17 cases of ‘extreme’ violence against abortion providers in the United States, such as arson, stabbing and bomb attacks.” However, the Bush Administration’s Department of Justice “prosecuted only 11 individuals for any acts of violence against abortion clinics or providers.”

Beck, Sanford allege Obama taking over state governments

Posted: | Posted by Chico Brisbane | Labels: , , , ,

Beck, Sanford allege Obama taking over state governments

Posted Jun 9, 2009, 9:54 AM PT by Jed Lewison • First broadcast: Jun 9, 2009
Yesterday, South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford officially
applied for stimulus funds as he had been ordered to do by the state’s supreme court in a decision upholding a vote by the state legislature requiring Sanford to use the funds.
After requesting the funds — as ordered by both the state court and state legislature — Sanford did the only natural thing for a guy in his position: he went on Glenn Beck’s show to complain that President Obama was engineering a federal takeover of his state.
"I mean, why have a state legislative body, why have a governor," Sanford asked, "if Washington is deciding it all?"


WATCH VIDEO


The thing neither Beck nor Sanford mentioned was that it wasn’t the federal government that forced Sanford to spend the money — it was the state legislature, whose decision was
enforced by the state supreme court.
Beck and Sanford make it seem like this was a dispute between South Carolina and the federal government. Wrong. It was dispute between Mark Sanford and his state’s legislature.
Far from supporting the paranoid conspiracy theory pushed by Beck and Sanford, it actually debunks it. The federal government didn’t force Sanford to do anything — it was his own state that did. The real question here is why Beck and Sanford are acting like conspiracy trolls.

This just might be Sean Hannity’s looniest attack ever

Posted: | Posted by Chico Brisbane | Labels: , ,

Posted Jun 4, 2009, 12:30 AM PT by Jed Lewison • First broadcast: Jun 3, 2009
Sean Hannity once again proves that he’s the guy who put the ‘a’ in moron, this time by pushing the bizarre myth that earlier this week President Obama called the U.S. "a Muslim nation."


WATCH VIDEO


As you can see in the video, President Obama’s actual remarks bear no resemblance whatsoever to Hannity’s false claim.